Search for: "Cordance Corporation"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2006, 1:40 pm
SHOWDOWN AT THE ONE-CLICK CORRAL - CORDANCE CORP. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:50 am
" Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:13 am
On August 18, 2009, a Delaware jury returned a verdict finding that Amazon.com, Inc. did not infringe two of the three patents owned and asserted by Cordance Corporation. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
" Cordance v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:21 am
"Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:36 am
.' "Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
.'" Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco, (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Delaware: Cordance wins JMOL in Amazon One-Click patent suit: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco, (EDTexweblog.com) District Court Delaware: Cordance wins JMOL in Amazon One-Click patent suit: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
EmulexAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
– Microsoft issue staff with Windows 7 phones (Property, intangible) US Patents – Decisions District Court Delaware – Amazon’s infringing use of One-Click technology didn’t irreparably harm digital identity business sufficient to warrant permanent injunction: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
(Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) US Patents No patent for claimed method of patenting (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Disqualifying plaintiff’s litigation counsel based upon former joint defense agreement: In re Shared Memory Graphics LLC (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC: No evidence for priority claim: Cordance v Amazon (IPBiz) CAFC dismisses for lack of jurisdiction: Spread Spectrum v Eastman Kodak (IPBiz) District Court E D Texas: Email processing… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Federal Circuit’s en banc review of written description requirement does not constitute ‘intervening change’ or alter ‘existing standards’: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
